Photo 16 Jun 101 notes lizziegoneastray:

vaginapocalypse:

lizziegoneastray:

vaginapocalypse:

someone really just sent me this on skype
what in the flying fuck

Message them back the definition of the word “homonym” and then tell them to mind their own goddamn business.

I already blocked them on skype. I have literally no idea who this person is and I don’t want to press the issue any further, it actually really freaks me out because I don’t even know how they found out my skype name or who told them that or anything. I want to believe it’s just some random skype user that’s sending that shit to everybody…but I really don’t know. If someone really did tip them off, I would like to know because that means there is someone on my skype list that I can’t trust…

Can I do it instead?  People like this piss me off.

I like telling people like this one of these two things:
1. Words have different meanings depending on context.  Don’t tell me not to call someone “tall” since there are also “tall” coffees at Starbucks.  I will not be confused and accidentally try to drink a guy if you call him tall.
2. Invoking “that word means something IN SCIENCE” to tell us not to use the word is pathetic.  “Theory” means something different within a scientific experiment compared to what “theory” means outside scientific contexts.  The meanings of words that are used in specific scientific environments are never enforced as having NO RIGHTS TO USAGE outside that context.  That would be silly.  (But it’s easier to pretend this is a semantics issue than it is to actually address the fact that people who say this have a problem with asexuality, not language use.)
Iiiiinterestingly … this jerk who’s speaking for “Society” doesn’t even have the definition of asexuality right.  It’s not “not liking any type of sexual activity.”  Why can’t people like this just crawl back under the rocks they came from?

lizziegoneastray:

vaginapocalypse:

lizziegoneastray:

vaginapocalypse:

someone really just sent me this on skype

what in the flying fuck

Message them back the definition of the word “homonym” and then tell them to mind their own goddamn business.

I already blocked them on skype. I have literally no idea who this person is and I don’t want to press the issue any further, it actually really freaks me out because I don’t even know how they found out my skype name or who told them that or anything. I want to believe it’s just some random skype user that’s sending that shit to everybody…but I really don’t know. If someone really did tip them off, I would like to know because that means there is someone on my skype list that I can’t trust…

Can I do it instead?  People like this piss me off.

I like telling people like this one of these two things:

1. Words have different meanings depending on context.  Don’t tell me not to call someone “tall” since there are also “tall” coffees at Starbucks.  I will not be confused and accidentally try to drink a guy if you call him tall.

2. Invoking “that word means something IN SCIENCE” to tell us not to use the word is pathetic.  “Theory” means something different within a scientific experiment compared to what “theory” means outside scientific contexts.  The meanings of words that are used in specific scientific environments are never enforced as having NO RIGHTS TO USAGE outside that context.  That would be silly.  (But it’s easier to pretend this is a semantics issue than it is to actually address the fact that people who say this have a problem with asexuality, not language use.)

Iiiiinterestingly … this jerk who’s speaking for “Society” doesn’t even have the definition of asexuality right.  It’s not “not liking any type of sexual activity.”  Why can’t people like this just crawl back under the rocks they came from?

  1. ceruleansugar reblogged this from huehuehuehuehuecoyotl
  2. huehuehuehuehuecoyotl reblogged this from shslkanyewest
  3. blahstuck reblogged this from beanthewiener and added:
    Oh my Mr. Fisk Farron Solfire person, I am so sorry. Out of the many definitions of asexual I looked up in order to...
  4. beanthewiener reblogged this from tyriankarkat and added:
    wow this person can go fuck them selves i mean really whats wrong with you
  5. tyriankarkat reblogged this from sulkylass and added:
    wants to connect with you more like being a piece of shit get out
  6. sulkylass reblogged this from damegreywulf and added:
    jesus christ
  7. shslkanyewest reblogged this from damegreywulf and added:
    …That’s not even funny to begin with. It’s not witty, it’s incredibly stupid, and why the fuck would anyone send an anon...
  8. virgowithachainsaw reblogged this from damegreywulf
  9. damegreywulf reblogged this from man-of-clay and added:
    It’s not funny when you realize one of OP’s fucking friends sent some random asshole after them over “incorrect usage of...
  10. huntersassemble reblogged this from ayantiel
  11. c0mp1337 reblogged this from godofslams and added:
    oh fuck
  12. godofslams reblogged this from man-of-clay
  13. selfindulgentmannequin reblogged this from existenceintheclouds
  14. existenceintheclouds reblogged this from rucemia
  15. rucemia reblogged this from man-of-clay
  16. oddpicturesoddpeople reblogged this from lord-kitschener
  17. nonifarted reblogged this from handcuffs-and-cheese
  18. ayantiel reblogged this from handcuffs-and-cheese
  19. notwearingatardis reblogged this from handcuffs-and-cheese
  20. benzalkoniumchloride reblogged this from johnsmithwillbemyconstant
  21. johnsmithwillbemyconstant reblogged this from handcuffs-and-cheese
  22. solitarygrimangel reblogged this from swankivy
  23. gamingtimeladyfromgallifrey reblogged this from swankivy and added:
    i actually think he is confusing asexual with asexual reproduction…but still policing someone else’s sexuality just...
  24. betashae reblogged this from flanoirbunny

Design crafted by Prashanth Kamalakanthan. Powered by Tumblr.